Rights and Protections Publications

Topics

Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.

Publication type

Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Showing 1 - 20 of 247 results

3646/2019 concerning removal to Malta

The author alleged that by deporting him to Malta, Australia had violated articles 9(1); 12(4); 14(7), read in conjunction with articles 9, 12(4) and 17; and 17, read in conjunction with articles 2(2) and 23(1) of the ICCPR. The Committee issued adverse views in respect of articles 9(1) and 12(4):

3585/2019 concerning a Native Title claim

The author alleged that Australia had violated articles 2(3), 14(1), 26, and 27 of the ICCPR, read in light of article 1, through the Federal Court's dismissal of a native title claim made by the author. The Committee issued adverse views in respect of article 14(1), read alone and in conjunction with article 2(3)(a), and article 27, read in light of article 1.

1051/2021 concerning removal to Sri Lanka

The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if it were to deport the author to Sri Lanka. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found that Australia would not be in violation if the author was removed.

1010/2020 concerning removal to Sri Lanka

The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if it were to deport the author to Sri Lanka. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found the matter inadmissible.

S.R. v Australia (1012/2020) Views of 3 November 2023

Guidelines
1012/2020 concerning removal to Iran The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if the author was returned to Iran. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found the matter inadmissible.

I.N. v Australia (995/2020) Views of 3 November 2023

Guidelines
995/2020 concerning removal to Pakistan The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if the author was returned to Pakistan. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found that Australia would not be in violation if the author was removed.